《环境工程学报》第三届编委会2019年度工作会议顺利召开    《环境工程学报》获“2017年度科学传播特殊贡献单位”荣誉称号    《环境工程学报》启用DOI通知设为首页|加入收藏
引用本文
  • 徐晨璐,尹志轩,李春雨,毕学军,顾瑞环.垃圾渗滤液补充反硝化碳源强化脱氮效果[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(5):1106-1112.DOI:10.12030/j.cjee.201808078    [点击复制]
  • XU Chenlu,YIN Zhixuan,LI Chunyu,BI Xuejun,GU Ruihuan.Nitrogen removal enhancement with landfill leachate as supplemental carbon source for denitrification[J].,2019,13(5):1106-1112.DOI:10.12030/j.cjee.201808078   [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【在线阅读全文】【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览次   下载 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
垃圾渗滤液补充反硝化碳源强化脱氮效果
徐晨璐1,尹志轩1,李春雨1,毕学军1,顾瑞环2
0
(1.青岛理工大学环境与市政工程学院,青岛 266033;2.青岛首创瑞海水务有限公司,青岛 266042)
摘要:
垃圾渗滤液中含有大量易被微生物利用的挥发性脂肪酸,若其可以作为城镇污水处理厂的补充碳源,将对降低碳源投加成本和实现垃圾渗滤液的资源化利用有重要意义。在实际城镇污水处理厂考察了垃圾渗滤液补充进水碳源的脱氮效果,并进一步对比了传统碳源(甲醇、乙酸钠)、垃圾渗滤液及垃圾渗滤液在不同pH条件下产生的水解酸化液作为碳源时的反硝化效果。结果表明,实际城镇污水处理厂投加乙酸钠作为补充碳源时总氮去除率仅提高3%左右,而在进水中混合垃圾渗滤液后提高了约10%。垃圾渗滤液与乙酸钠作碳源时NO3--N去除率均>97%,但垃圾渗滤液为碳源时最大比反硝化速率高达8.8 mg·(g·h) -1(以MLSS计),是乙酸钠为碳源时的1.7倍;垃圾渗滤液中性和碱性水解酸化液为碳源时,反硝化效果相差不大,最大比反硝化速率为4.5~4.8 mg·(g·h) -1(以MLSS计),NO3--N去除率仅为70%左右。垃圾渗滤液或其水解酸化液是否可以作为强化脱氮效果的补充碳源取决于基质本身的性质。
关键词:  垃圾渗滤液资源化  外加脱氮碳源  反硝化  水解酸化
DOI:10.12030/j.cjee.201808078
投稿时间:2018-08-12
基金项目:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项2017ZX07101-002; 国家国际科技合作专项项目2016YFE0123500-003国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2017ZX07101-002); 国家国际科技合作专项项目(2016YFE0123500-003)
Nitrogen removal enhancement with landfill leachate as supplemental carbon source for denitrification
XU Chenlu1,YIN Zhixuan1,LI Chunyu1,BI Xuejun1,GU Ruihuan2
(1.School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China;2.Qingdao Capital Ruihai Water Co. Ltd., Qingdao 266042, China;*Correspording author, E-mail: yzxqut@163.com)
Abstract:
Because of containing large amount of readily biodegradable volatile fatty acids in landfill leachate, it is expected to use this leachate as a type of supplemental carbon source for denitrification in municipal wastewater treatment plant, which will have great significance in cost reduction of external carbon source and resource utilization of landfill leachate. The nitrogen removal effect was investigated when the landfill leachate was taken as supplemental carbon source in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Furthermore, the denitrification efficiencies were compared among different carbon sources, such as traditional methanol and sodium acetate, landfill leachate and its hydrolysis acidification liquor at different pH. The results show that total nitrogen removal efficiency only increased by 3% with sodium acetate as external carbon source, but increased by about 10% when landfill leachate was mixed in the influent of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. In the batch tests, NO3--N removal efficiencies could reach over 97% when landfill leachate or sodium acetate was taken as carbon source, respectively, while the maximum specific denitrification rate with landfill leachate carbon source was 8.8 mg·(g·h) -1 (calculated by MLSS), which was 1.7 times with sodium acetate. There is almost no difference in the denitrification efficiencies between neutral and alkaline hydrolysis acidification liquor carbon sources of landfill leachate, the maximum specific denitrification rates were 4.5~ 4.8 mg·(g·h) -1(calculated by MLSS), and nitrate removal efficiencies were only 70%. Thus, whether landfill leachate and its hydrolysis acidification liquor can be taken as an alternative external carbon source for nitrogen removal enhancement is dependent on its own characteristics.
Key words:  resource recovery from landfill leachate  external carbon source for nitrogen removal  denitrification  hydrolysis and acidification